POLL: CA divided on whether local officials should help ICE take people into custody for minor offenses

ByABC7.com staff KABC logo
Thursday, March 29, 2018
In this Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2017, photo released by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, foreign nationals are arrested during a targeted enforcement operation.
A photo released by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement shows foreign nationals being arrested.
Charles Reed/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement via AP

California voters are divided on whether they believe local officials should help, hinder or stay out of the way when federal ICE agents go after those accused of minor offenses, according to a SurveyUSA poll conducted for Eyewitness News.

Poll results show that when it comes to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials taking custody of immigrants accused of violent crimes, a majority statewide (54 percent) say that local officials should work to help ICE. Just 11 percent said local California officials should try to stop ICE in such circumstances, and 24 percent said local officials should stay out of the way.

Voters are much more divided in cases when ICE agents are trying to arrest immigrants for non-violent crimes. According to poll results, 29 percent said local officials should help ICE, with Republicans four times more likely as Democrats to say so.

Results also show that 25 percent said local officials should try to stop ICE, with liberal voters four times as likely as conservative voters to say so. Lastly, 34 percent said local officials should stay out of the way. Similar results were seen in cases where ICE agents go after immigrants accused of immigration violations only.

In the context of vocal local opposition to the Trump administration's immigration policies, and shortly after President Donald Trump came to California to inspect prototypes of different walls that might be built along the Mexican border, SurveyUSA asked voters how they would characterize the need to erect a physical barrier:

- 11% say it's one of the nation's top priorities.

- 14% say it's a high priority.

- 14% say it's a priority.

- 19% say it's not a priority.

- 40% say it's a distraction.

Separately, voters by 5:1 are opposed to a section of Northern California cleaving off from the rest of the state, becoming America's 51st state, and taking the name of Jefferson.

Republicans, conservatives, men and young people are slightly more likely to favor cutting the state in half, but majorities across the demographic spectrum oppose the publicized plan.

Here are the poll's questions and the respondents' answers, by percentage:

"Should officials in California who become aware that Immigration Customs and Enforcement agents are about to take immigrants into custody actively work to help ICE do so ... actively work to stop ICE from doing do ... or stay out of the way...in each of the following situations? When ICE arrests immigrants accused of violent crimes?"

54% - Work To Help ICE

11% - Work To Stop ICE

24% - Stay Out Of The Way

10% - Not Sure

"When ICE arrests immigrants accused of minor non-violent crimes?"

29% - Work To Help ICE

25% - Work To Stop ICE

34% - Stay Out Of The Way

12% - Not Sure

"When ICE arrests immigrants accused of only immigration violations?"

27% - Work To Help ICE

28% - Work To Stop ICE

33% - Stay Out Of The Way

12% - Not Sure

"President Trump came to California to look at prototypes of the kind of border walls that Trump wants to erect between the United States and Mexico. Is building a wall between the United States and Mexico..."

11% - One Of The Nation's Highest Priorities

14% - A High Priority

14% - A Priority

19% - Not a Priority

40% - A Distraction

3% - Not Sure

"Should California secede from the United States and become its own country? Or, should California remain a state in the union?"

14% - Secede

73% - Remain

13% - Not Sure

"Whether or not California should secede from the United States, should the Northern, rural part of California secede from the state of California and become its own state, with the proposed name of Jefferson? Or should the northern, rural part of California remain part of California?"

15% - Northern Part Should Secede

72% - Remain Part Of California

13% - Not Sure

SurveyUSA interviewed 882 registered voters March 22, 2018 through March 25, 2018. A larger group, 1,100 adults, were asked questions about whether California should secede from the union and whether a section of Northern California should split off and become the state of Jefferson.