PROPOSITION 8:
Regulates amounts outpatient kidney dialysis clinics charge for dialysis treatment. Initiative statute.
SUMMARY:
A "YES" votes supports requiring kidney dialysis clinics to refund to patients or their insurance providers any revenue above 115% of the cost of direct patient care and healthcare improvements. Backers believe it would incentivize clinics to invest in facility improvements and worker training.
Some analysts see Prop. 8 as the latest fight in the battle for SEIU to unionize workers at California's two, largest dialysis providers, DaVita and Fresenius Medical Care.
HOW DID IT GET ON MY BALLOT:
Supporters of Prop. 8 collected enough signatures of registered voters to qualify it as a ballot measure.
MAJOR BACKERS:
California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), California Labor Federation, United Healthcare Workers West (Part of SEIU)
MAJOR OPPONENTS:
California Medical Association, National Kidney Foundation, DaVita Dialysis, American Renal Management LLC
IMPACT TO TAXPAYERS:
State and Local Governments could save millions per year in reduced patient care costs. State could face a higher cost of ensuring compliance with the law. This could be offset by higher licensing fees.
*NOTE: All information regarding donations as backers or opponents of a ballot measure reflects financial disclosures made to California's Secretary of State as of September 7, 2018.
2018 VOTER GUIDE: A look at California's Prop 8: Dialysis clinics' revenue limits and required refunds