In a city that has had domestic partnerships for all, it was a shocker to think the state had not followed San Francisco's lead when it came to opposite-sex couples.
"I know San Francisco is more progressive than the rest of the state, but still," expressed San Francisco resident Brent Yonehara.
State Sen. Scott Wiener authored the bill.
RELATED: New California laws 2020: Minimum wage, power outages, more rules changing in 2020
"It was discrimination before against straight couples and we ended that discrimination," he explained.
Until now, this option was only available to same-sex couples and anyone over the age of 62 who receives social security benefits.
"For seniors, remaining unmarried can mean higher social security benefits for the two combined than being married," added Wiener.
In 2013, California same-sex couples were allowed to marry. So they had the option to choose between marriage and a domestic partnership.
The benefits are nearly the same:
- The rights of survivorship apply
- One can adopt a previously born child to a domestic partner
- You can add a partner to your health care plan
- Both have the right to own community property
"It's a personal choice, but at least there's another option out there, options are good right?" said Yonehara.
But under federal law, there are things that a domestic partnership does not give you.
- One cannot sponsor a non-citizen partner
- No adopting a child from another country
- There are few rights when traveling to certain states
- You must file federal taxes as two single partners
Yonehara and Christian Czezatke opted to get married.
"It's a form of recognition for your relationship," said Czezatke.
By the way, dissolving a domestic partnership is identical to getting a divorce.