LOS ANGELES (KABC) -- An overarching message from three reports on the Los Angeles Police Department's handling of protests nearly one year ago is the department and its officers were not properly trained or prepared - from planning to the use of less-lethal weapons officers fired, which injured several demonstrators.
"I believe each of these reports identify the critical role of ongoing and persistent training," LAPD Chief Michel Moore said to the L.A. Police Commission.
"You have to have that capacity to really learn and adjust," said L.A. Police Commissioner Dale Bonner. "A lot of what's being discussed today is long-term policy changes, things that will take a long time."
The latest reports include an internal LAPD review and another by the National Police Foundation. Some highlighted the influence of small groups responsible for vandalism, as well as criticism of the LAPD at the height of the protests on May 30 and at later demonstrations.
"When the LAPD was deployed to Pan Pacific area in full gear in batons and the helmets and protective gear, that sends a signal to those who are protesting that the police are prepared, not only for engagement but they are going to engage," said Rev. Jeffrey Brown.
"We protest every week at 3 o'clock across from the PPL and in front of the ACLU. It is always peaceful, because we know what we're doing," said Akili, an organizer with Black Lives Matter Los Angeles.
"Very much like the reports that we saw after the Watts uprising and rebellion, after the 1992 uprising, after the May 1 uprising after the 2014 Ferguson response here in L.A," he said. "There's this pattern: uprising, surprise, what are we going to do? More training."
He also stressed the need for a meaningful opportunity for the public to participate in conversations about the reports and the recommendations.
"They get 45 minutes for public comment," he said. "That's not how you get in put. That's not how you listen to the people. You get 45 minutes...maybe 15 people can go there at the most."